Between posts from my friends drewan and laurel and even minnehaha, I've got to thinking about what it is that makes up my political views.
One way I look at is based on the classic hierarchy of needs:
- Air to breath;
We mostly have this. It could sure be cleaner in a lot of ways, but, basically, everyone's getting enough oxygen in the country.
- Water to drink;
Like air, we mostly have this. Could be cleaner, again, but there's no great shortage of drinking water.
- Food to eat;
OK, now we're getting into trouble. There are many people, a lot of them children, that don't get enough to eat in this country (not to mention the world). I think that the Great Depression shows us that this is a solvable problem. We need to identify areas where people need food and provide food for them. This should be life-sustaining at the least and any efforts to make it tasty should be encouraged. For this, I'm willing to pay taxes and I think most other folks would be as well.
Now we're in big trouble. Big chunks of people without a place to live. My thinking here would be building free housing for folks. (Making many construction jobs.) My initial thoughts are for high-density housing, providing what would be little more than a comfortable prison cell. Someplace warm, dry and safe. There would also have to be people supervising such buildings (more jobs) to prevent the problems that have plagued such efforts in the past. There would also have to be training for those supervisors and people to oversee them so that they didn't get abusive of the position. So we're talking a lot of money. Out of it, however, we'd get a lot of jobs plus a large workforce with various skills (though probably on the lower end of the scale).
Apropos of nothing, the other political thought I had was the dichotomy I see in the two major political parties. (I base this on the main rhetoric I hear from the parties so it is a skewed view.) I see the Democratic party as the party of solutions and the Republican party as the party of problems. That is, that Republican rhetoric is more likely to say "X is a problem." While Democratic rhetoric is more likely to say "Here's how we solve Y." I don't think either is the full extent of the thinking of the leaders of the parties, much less their members but it is the impression that I developed over this last campaign.